Infrastructure

Canceling New Fortress Contract Would Cost $180–$200 Million More in Fuel, Ricardo Ramos Says

Published Nov 6, 2026, 7:59 AM ASTvia NotiUno

At a glance

  • Canceling the New Fortress Energy contract immediately would add $180 million to $200 million a year in fuel costs, former PREPA executive director Ricardo Ramos said.
  • Ramos said PREPA had been saving roughly $180 million to $200 million a year since New Fortress built the terminal with its own investment, after paying about $200 million more when plants ran on diesel.
  • Ramos proposed negotiating greater supply guarantees and eventually canceling once an alternative exists, pointing to a gas pipeline from EcoEléctrica’s southern terminal to metropolitan-area plants.

Why this matters: The $180 million to $200 million a year Ramos ties to an immediate cancellation would land on PREPA’s fuel bill, the cost line that feeds every household’s and business’s electricity rate on an island where rates are already a main pocketbook concern.

Canceling Puerto Rico’s contract with New Fortress Energy immediately would mean assuming between $180 million and $200 million in additional fuel costs a year, former Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA (AEE); PREPA) executive director Ricardo Ramos said in an interview with Normando en la Mañana. Ramos said the contract was signed in 2018 because in 2007 Puerto Rico had no natural gas in San Juan and the plants ran on diesel.

At that time, he said, the island paid roughly one to one and a half cents more on its rate, spending about $200 million. Since New Fortress built the terminal with its own investment, he said, PREPA had been saving roughly $180 million to $200 million a year without major consequences. Ramos said his comments were not a defense of the company: "New Fortress está actuando mal y hay que hacer algo con el contrato, pero tenemos que tener cuidado cuando hablamos de cancelaciones," he said, adding that New Fortress is acting badly and something must be done with the contract but that cancellations require care.

He attributed the company’s erratic behavior to the style of its main executive, Wesley Edens, calling him a risk-taker who asks forgiveness instead of permission and who now behaves "prácticamente como un pirata" with the terminal. Instead of immediate cancellation, Ramos proposed a middle ground: negotiate greater supply guarantees, ensure others can enter if available, and eventually cancel once an alternative exists.

He said the structural solution already exists: a gas pipeline connecting the gas available in the south of the island, at EcoEléctrica’s terminal, to the metropolitan-area plants. He ruled out truck transport as a viable substitute.

In context (787daily, from public data)

SourceNotiUno