Act 60

What the DDEC Crisis Means for Act 60

Published Jul 21, 2026 · 787 Daily · Original analysis

Eight weeks ago, Puerto Rico’s Department of Economic Development and Commerce — the agency that runs the island’s Act 60 incentives program — lost its secretary and more than ten of its senior officials in a single day. What looked at first like a political rupture has since grown into sworn testimony, a widening criminal probe, and a Senate investigation that may reach the governor herself. This analysis ties together our coverage of the saga and what it means if you hold, or are pursuing, a decree.

The story so far

The break came on May 26, when Secretary Sebastián Negrón Reichard resigned alongside the agency’s senior leadership, including the director of the Office of Incentives for Business (OIN), the division that administers Act 60 decrees. He said trust with La Fortaleza “no longer exists,” pointing to interventions in matters the law delegates to the Secretary — among them the reversal of two summary suspensions he had issued after an internal evaluation of a contracting process.

Oversight widened from there. In June, the Justice Department’s referral led the Panel on the Independent Special Prosecutor to find sufficient cause and assign two special prosecutors — a case whose chair says has merit. On July 9, Negrón Reichard put his allegations under oath in a 58-page declaration to the Senate; chief of staff Francisco Domenech denies them. Within a week, the Senate president had referred the deputy chief of staff to the ethics office and the prosecutor panel, senators were weighing whether to summon Governor González Colón to testify, and the panel formally expanded its probe to include Domenech and Undersecretary Itza García — a step the governor called “the expected result.”

Why this is an Act 60 story

The allegations run straight through the incentives program. The complaints describe intervention favoring tax decrees for the Opus Miramar project, linked to Politank — the lobbying firm Domenech founded, which holds its own export-services decree. In July, the DDEC fined Politank $80,000 for tax-decree violations: missing, late, and incomplete annual reports, and an unauthorized change of control — after the outgoing OIN director had recommended annulling the decree outright on his last day in the post. However those cases resolve, they put the two questions that matter most to every decree holder on the public record: who decides who gets a decree, and who polices compliance.

What it means in practice

Continuity. The mass resignation emptied the leadership layer that processes and oversees decrees. New secretary Carlos Ríos Pierluisi, confirmed in June, says his priority is restoring “stability, certainty, and continuity”. Until the OIN’s leadership is rebuilt, expect the practical texture of the program — processing times, report reviews, reconsideration requests — to reflect an agency in transition.

Enforcement. The Politank fine shows the compliance machinery working publicly and by the book — 20 days to file, 15 to cure, revocation on repeat noncompliance. If the investigations sustain the interference allegations, the likeliest institutional response is more of this: stricter, more documented, less discretionary enforcement across the decree base. Holders who are current on their annual reports have little to fear from that; those who aren’t should read the fine as a preview.

Credibility. Experts are already debating what the scandal says about political influence in public administration, and the controversy has resonated with international investment audiences even as businesses at BIO International downplayed it. Act 60’s pitch to investors depends on decisions being predictable and rule-bound; the saga is the most direct test of that premise since the incentives code was created.

What to watch

The special prosecutors’ findings on Domenech, García, and the two former permits officials; whether the Senate formally summons the governor; how quickly the OIN’s leadership is rebuilt; and whether the whistleblower concerns raised by the resignations produce any structural protection. We’ll keep each development linked from this page and the Act 60 hub.